Legal Opinion

Adrian Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Lane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to settle a bill of exceptions. The facts are stated in the ©pinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Eer Curiam.

A verdict was rendered and judgment •entered against relator May 29, 1891. Time was granted to the relator in which to move for a new trial, .and .subsequently the time was extended for that purpose. Within the time granted a motion for a new trial- was made, which was afterwards heard, but said motion was not finally disposed of and determined until May 12, 1892. . After the motion for a new trial was determined, relator moved the court for time within which to settle a bill of exceptions, but the court denied the motion, upon the ground that the term in which the judgment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greeley v. PercivalSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
  2. Cleveland v. SteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  2. State ex rel. Payson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Roach v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Harper v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API