Adrian Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Lane
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to settle a bill of exceptions. The facts are stated in the ©pinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Eer Curiam.
A verdict was rendered and judgment •entered against relator May 29, 1891. Time was granted to the relator in which to move for a new trial, .and .subsequently the time was extended for that purpose. Within the time granted a motion for a new trial- was made, which was afterwards heard, but said motion was not finally disposed of and determined until May 12, 1892. . After the motion for a new trial was determined, relator moved the court for time within which to settle a bill of exceptions, but the court denied the motion, upon the ground that the term in which the judgment was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greeley v. PercivalSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
- Cleveland v. SteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cobb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- State ex rel. Payson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Roach v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Harper v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909