Pan-American Life Ins. Co. v. Peebles
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a suit by the beneficiary in an insurance annuity contract, whose terms are set out in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. That court held that the beneficiary was not entitled to recover. We agree with the Court of Appeals, but the earnest argument of counsel for petitioner impels us to give expression to our views.
It is claimed that the beneficiary may recover, under the third agreement to pay, a certain amount by reason of an option right conferred on the annuitant in the nonforfeiture provision.
The third agreement confers on her at his death the right to a refund…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunter-Benn Co. Company v. Bassett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- World's Exposition Shows, Inc. v. B. P. O. Elks, No. 148Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Barton v. W. O. Broyles Stove & Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Nelson v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Davis v. Folmar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zimmerman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1957