Legal Opinion

In Re: 4744 Subpoenas Duces Tecum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 2021No. 68 EM 2021Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT IN RE: 4,744 SUBPOENAS DUCES : No. 68 EM 2021 TECUM ISSUED BY THE PHILADELPHIA : DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO THE : PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT : : : PETITION OF: THE PHILADELPHIA : POLICE DEPARTMENT : : : : : DISSENTING STATEMENT JUSTICE DOUGHERTY FILED: November 5, 2021 As this Court has long recognized, our extraordinary and sweeping jurisdiction at King’s Bench must be exercised with “extreme caution” due to the possibility of abuse. Commonwealth v. Balph,

3 A. 220, 230

(Pa. 1886). But caution does not mean inaction. “[T]he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. College Watercolor Group, Inc. v. William H. Newbauer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API