Legal Opinion

Ward v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1899PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the District Court of Lincoln County; before John H. Burforcl, District Judge. Henry Wand' was convicted of robbery and appeals..

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tire court by

Burwell, J.:

The defendant, Henry Ward, was indicted, tried and convicted fd-r the crime of robbery, and. sentenced by the court therefor to a term of ten years in the territorial penitentiary. From this judgment and sentence the defendant appealed to this court.

Two questions! are presented by plaintiff in error for ■cur consideration: First, 1^ it necessary for the defendant, when charged with a felony, to be present at every stage of the proceedings? Second. Does the récord in this case show the defendant’s preesnce at all necessary times?

An examination of the record…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Joseph, Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Booze v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API