Legal Opinion

Chirico v. BD. OF SUP'RS FOR NEWTOWN TP.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1988No. 66 and 67 E.D. Appeal Docket 1982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted cross-petitions for allowance of appeal to review the arbitration award granting non-service disability pension benefits in the amount of 65 percent of a police officer’s monthly salary and reducing the minimum age for retirement from 55 to 53 upon completion of an actuarial study. The trial court reversed the award with regard to the percentage of pension benefits payable and in the reduction of the minimum age for retirement without the arbitrators first considering an actuarial study, but affirmed the award in granting pension benefits to a policeman not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Lower Merion Fraternal Order of Police Lodge Number Twenty-Eight v. Township of Lower MerionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. In re the Arbitration between the Borough of Ambridge & the Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. In re Appeal of StantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Board of Supervisors v. ChiricoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Upper Chichester Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Crouse v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. American Federation of State v. Borough of State CollegeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Derry Tp. v. Com., Pa. Labor Rel. Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API