Legal Opinion

State v. Quevedo

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2014No. 26666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Alisia Quevedo appeals the circuit court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence. Because law enforcement officers constitutionally entered the Black Hawk home to arrest both Quevedo and Yellow Eagle, the circuit court properly denied the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of her arrest. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] On April 2, 2012, a federal court issued an arrest warrant for Christopher Yellow Eagle for a supervised release violation. When law enforcement had previously served an arrest warrant on Yellow Eagle for an unrelated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Phillip LauterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Larry Risse, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. State v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. QuevedoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. United States v. ArtisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API