Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Ingraham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: This appeal is from the order denying the motion to vacate the order granting the mistrial. (See Fine v. Cummins, 260 App. Div. 569, and Matter of Taylor, 271 App. Div. 947.) It was within the discretion of the trial court to order the withdrawal of a juror and a mistrial, but that part of the order awarding $100 costs to the plaintiff to be paid by the defendant before proceeding further to defend the action, is unauthorized. Costs upon trial of an action are regulated by statute and not otherwise. (See Modern Silk Co. v. Weinstein, 100 Misc. 358; Finck v. Stachelberg, 86 N. Y.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fine v. CumminsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Browning v. BrokawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Modern Silk Co. v. WeinsteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API