State v. Rowland

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

In this action defendant was charged with forgery in three counts and uttering forged checks in three counts. He was acquitted on the three forgery charges and convicted on the three uttering charges. He appeals.

The defendant states the questions to be — Did the trial court err in admission of evidence, in admitting incompetent testimony; was the verdict contrary to the evidence; did the court err in sustaining objections to evidence offered by defendant; and did the court err in the form of verdicts submitted?

There are some conceded facts…