Legal Opinion

Vermont Mutual Fire Insurance v. Van Dyke

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

Bomauld Paradis, the owner of certain farm buildings in East Hereford, P. Q., took out a fire insurance policy thereon in the plaintiff company. By its terms, any loss thereunder was payable to the defendant, as mortgagee, as his interest might appear. This provision was embodied in an “open mortgage” clause, so-called. The policy contained the usual provisions against encumbrances, change of title, and 'concealment or misrepresentation before or after loss — breach of which was to render the policy void. While the policy was in force and without change material here, some of the buildings…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ball v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Merchants' Insurance Co. of Providence v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. RuddyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Williamson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federated Mutual Ins. Co. v. Good Samaritan Hosp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re Estate of EverettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Fellows v. MauserDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1969
  4. Green Mountain Mutual Fire Insurance v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. Sanya Virani v. NLV Financial Corporation, National Life Insurance Company, and Life Insurance Company of the SouthwestDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API