Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Doe Ex Rel. Johnson v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 5, 2010No. 08-2161Published

1Concurring in the judgmentWilkinson, Circuit Judge

I agree with the affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to Thompson on all federal claims.* Maj. Op. at 179. I agree also with the vacatur of summary judgment and remand on the state claim, with explicit permission for the district court to further remand those claims back to state court. Maj. Op. at 179.

State court is the place where claims such as these should be heard. We should not further constitutionalize this intensely domestic area of the law. Every tort committed in this country by some public actor *180was never meant to be a matter of constitutional import. See Paul v. Davis, 424…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API