Legal Opinion

Cook v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1910No. A-225PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Gh'ady County Court; N. M. Williams, Judge. Defendant wa-s convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law and was fined $300 and sentenced to 30 days’ confinement in the county jail, and he appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

FUBMAN, Presiding Judge.

The first assignment of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The rule in such cases is that if there is evidence in the record from which the jury could legitimately draw the conclusion of guilt, the verdict will -not be disturbed upon the ground of the insufficiency of the testimony'unless the record shows that the jury was influenced by improper considerations in convicting the defendant. We find nothing of this kind in the record before us.

A. 0. Holmes testified that he was in business in the town of Chickasha; that two men named…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slater v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bundy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API