Legal Opinion
Abrams v. Barnett
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 8, 1996No. 95-4065PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
The Supreme Court vacated our earlier judgment in this ease and remanded for further consideration in light of the Court’s decision in Lindh v. Murphy, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2059, 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997). See Abrams v. Barnett, 100 F.3d 485 (7th Cir.1996), vacated, Abrams v. Barnett, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2503, 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997). Reversing a decision of this court, the Supreme Court held in Lindh that the amendments to chapter 153 of Title 28 enacted by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), do not apply to cases, such…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Damacio Y. Torres v. K.W. Prunty, in His Capacity as WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Robert Earl Badelle v. Curtis CorrellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Lamar E. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Lawrence Gregory-Bey v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Jim Lowery v. Rondle Anderson, Superintendent, Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.