Legal Opinion
Toilet Goods Ass'n v. Finch
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 25, 1969No. 617, Docket 32531PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
Nine years ago Congress amended the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1040 (1938), by enacting the Color Additive Amendments of 1960, 74 Stat. 397. Nearly three years later, after appropriate rule-making proceedings, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published its Regulations thereunder, 28 F.R. 6439. This litigation about the validity of their provisions concerning diluents, finished cosmetics and hair-dyes has continued ever since. An initial effort by the Government to prevent the judicial review of the Regulations sought by the cosmetics industry, on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of New York v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Certified Color Manufacturers Association v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of the Department of HewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Gonzalez v. L'OREAL USA, INC.District Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- United States v. Two Plastic Drums, More or Less of An Article of FoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Envirokare Tech, Inc. v. PappasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.