Legal Opinion

Strongsville Board of Education v. Zaino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2001No. Nos. 00-841 and 00-842PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

These two cases have been combined for oral argument and decision.

Factual and Procedural Background

On July 7, 1998, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (“Clinic”) filed an application with the Tax Commissioner to exempt from taxation certain real property in the Strongsville school district. The commissioner sent a notice dated August 24, 1998, to the Strongsville Board of Education (“BOE”), stating that an application for exemption of the property had been filed. Pursuant to R.C. 5715.27(C), discussed below, the BOE had until November 30, 1998, to file a statement with the commissioner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Osborne Bros. Welding Supply, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. J.M. Smucker, L.L.C. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Westerville City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. BT Property, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Cincinnati City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API