State v. Romero
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant the State of Indiana (State) appeals the acquittal of Defendant-Appellant Sean Romero a/k/a Sean German (Romero).
We affirm.
The State presents the following two issues for our review:
1. whether the trial court erred in allowing a former deputy prosecutor to represent Romero; and
2. whether the trial court erred in permitting an expert witness to testify concerning reconstructive memory.
In April, 1989, Romero was charged with murder and attempted murder in Lake County. After a jury trial, the jury was unable to reach a verdict and a mistrial was declared. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. Tippecanoe County CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Cornett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GoodrichIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Wissman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. GarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Byrd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. RomeroIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.