Legal Opinion

United States v. Philips

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1901No. 24PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has held that there are two kinds of interventions. To the one class belong those cases in which the court or chancellor to whom the application is made is not bound to permit a third party to intervene, and load the case with collateral issues, and in which the allowance of an intervention is entirely discretionary with the chancellor. To the other class of cases belong those in which the right to intervene is absolute, resting, as it does, upon the grounds of necessity, and the inability of the intervener to obtain such relief as he is entitled to by any other means than an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minot v. MastinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  2. Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  2. Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Swift v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  4. Palmer v. Bankers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. United States & Mexican Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API