Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 22, 1999No. 98-600PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Senior Judge.

This appeal challenges a trial court determination that a “per capita” payment to a Native American by reason of tribe membership should be considered income and included in computing his child support obligation. Because we think the inclusion was correct, we affirm. We reverse on a cross-appeal challenging the denial of attorney fees.

Heather, the respondent, and Dwayne, the petitioner, are parents of two children. Heather, their primary caregiver, earned $16,411 in 1997, the year on which the support payment obligations were reckoned. Dwayne, a member of the Mesk-waki…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. In Re the Marriage of BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. In Re the Marriage of WesselsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. In Re the Marriage of RussellCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1993
  5. Stevens v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Markey v. CarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. In Re the Marriage of McCurninSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. In Re KedrowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2002
  4. M.S. v. O.S.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Ms v. OsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API