Elvic Import Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
The suit listed above challenges the classification by the collector of customs of certain imported merchandise as “Silk netting made on a lace or net machine — not bobbinet” and the assessment of duty thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802. Plaintiff claims said merchandise to be properly dutiable at the rate of 32¡4 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 1529, as modified by the Torquay protocol to the said general agreement, 86…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sidenberg v. RobertsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
- Tiedeman & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Van Raalte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
3Cited by35 opinions
- David E. Schwab & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Bernstein & Skolnick, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- D. Strauss Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- David E. Schwab Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Dynamo Tulle Imp. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.