Ostertag v. Galbraith
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Hall county. Tried below before Tiffany, J. Ruge v. State, 62 Ind., 388. National Assw. v. Miller, 2 S. W. Rep., 900. Hkhn, dson v. Goddard, 23 How., 28. Moore & Cozvne v. Ilerron, 17 Neb., 700. Polin v. State, 14 Id., 546. Hemmensv. Bentley, 32 Mich., 89. Beithmiller v. People, 44 Mich., 284. Estes v. Mitohell, 96 Mass., 156.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The defendant in error brought an action against the plaintiffs to recover certain horses described in the petition. Her claim to the possession of said horses is stated in the petition as follows : “ That the interest in said property is of the following nature and kind, that is to say: That heretofore and on the 18th day of March, a.d. 1886, one Clarke S. Galbraith, then of the city of Atchison, in Atchison county, state of Kansas, being then indebted to this plaintiff in the sum of $2,000, to secure the same, did make, execute, and deliver to this plaintiff, his certain chattel mortgage,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- M. P. Musser & Co. v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Harn v. Amazon Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Peabody v. PaakauaHawaii Supreme Court · 1918
- New Lincoln Hotel Co. v. ShearsNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. SteeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.