Legal Opinion

Furbee v. Shay

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Tjder County. Action by D. M. Furbee and others against Shay & McMullen. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Dent, PresideNt:

This is an action of debt originally instituted by Fur-bee Bros, and Smith against Shay & McMullen, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants for the sum of one hundred and forty-one dollars and twenty-five cents. The defendants appealed to the circuit court of Tyler County, wherein the same result was reached. They then came to this Court, and here rely on the following errors:

*737First, that the jury was sworn to try the “matters in difference” before the issue was made up. This question has been settled by this Court in the case of White v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffith v. CorrothersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Craft v. MannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. White v. EmblemWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Griffin v. HaughtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richmond v. HendersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Rollins v. DarabanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Jordan v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Standard Mercantile Co. v. EllisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Turk v. HevenerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API