Legal Opinion

Korta v. Rausch Equipment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: To resist a motion to dismiss for failure to serve a complaint after a demand plaintiff must (1) show that the delay is excusable and (2) submit proof by one having knowledge that the cause of action is meritorious (Dobbins v County of Erie, 65 AD2d 934, 935; Allen v Berton, 55 AD2d 1049). Plaintiff has failed to satisfy either of these requirements and the court abused its discretion in granting reargument and vacating its original order dismissing the action. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—reargument of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. BertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Dobbins v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API