Legal Opinion

People v. Anthony R.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1984No. F002796PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

This juvenile appeal deals with a post-Proposition 8 construction of Penal Code section 666. The section states: “Every person who, having been convicted of petit theft, grand theft, burglary, or robbery and having served a term therefor in any penal institution or having been imprisoned therein as a condition of probation for such offense, is subsequently convicted of petit theft, then the person convicted of such subsequent offense is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison.” (Italics added.)

The 17-year-old appellant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. T.N.G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. Joseph B.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Leroy T. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. Jovan B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. Javier A.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. JacobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API