Legal Opinion

United States v. Dragone

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 8, 1996No. 1144, Docket 95-1475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the district court’s exercise of its discretion under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3162(a)(2), to dismiss “with prejudice” for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s Memorandum and Order dated July 7, 1995. See United States v. Upton, 921 F.Supp. 100 (E.D.N.Y.1995). Because of our disposition of this matter, we need not address the government’s challenge to the district court’s conclusion that the pretrial delay in this case violated the Constitution’s Speedy Trial Clause.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Elia Dragone Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Charles Bray Ray Stooksbury Edward Hay Robert Zuegel Edward Upton Joseph Moser Charles Catarelli Thomas Lewis Stephen Jones Roy Hardy Robert Knox Jacques Jean Hollis HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Robert Wiener, James Wiener, Richard Murphy, Michael Galati, Luis Cueto, John Pinto, Serge Jean-Jacques, Antonio Dejesus, Robert Humes, Joseph La Rosa, Domenic Paciello, Reinaldo Roman, James BroganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996