Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 2, 1989No. 88-750Published

1Per curiam

The order imposing costs under sections 960.20 and 27.3455(1), Florida Statutes, without notice or opportunity to be heard, violated appellant’s constitutional due process rights and is hereby reversed. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988), and Brooks v. State, 490 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). See also Harriet v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Hollis v. State, 525 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Morris v. State, 524 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Riccard v. State, 514 So.2d 83 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Evins v. State, 497 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 5th…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Harriel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Gaffney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API