Legal Opinion
Puri v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 12, 2011No. 3:10-cr-00118PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL
PETER C. DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 37(a), for an order to compel the deposition of Susan Barnett. Defendant opposes Plaintiffs motion. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 32] is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff commenced this action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”) and alleges that Defendant wrongfully denied her long term disability benefits under the Wildman, Harold, Allen & Dixon LLP Group Long Term Disability Policy (the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McCauley v. First Unum Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Marianne Locher v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, Katten Muchin & ZavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Burgio v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- Biomed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Oxford Health Plans (N.Y.), Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Gluc v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2015
- Joyner v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Liyan He v. Cigna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Chiara Bianchini v. The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.