Huber v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wertz J.:
LaVern J. Huber, plaintiff (appellee),- brought this action against Arthur H., Edna May, Orville, Robert and Norman Schmidt, and Mary M. and Ennis C. Whitehead, defendants (appellants), under the declaratory judgment act (G. S. 1949, 60-3127 et seq.), for the purpose of obtaining a judicial determination of the rights of the respective riparian property owners to the use and flow of the water in Sand Creek in Harvey county.
No useful purpose would be served in detailing the allegations of plaintiff's petition as amended. Briefly, plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hyde Park Dairies, Inc. v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- State Association of Chiropractors v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Bodle v. BalchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Simmons v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Stalnaker v. McCorgarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cady v. CadySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Wagner v. MahaffeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Alliance Mutual Casualty Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Savage v. SavageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963