Legal Opinion

Bruning v. Pixler

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1991No. 90-1296PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Keith Robinson and J. Stewart Ferguson appeal the district court’s order denying their Motion for Summary Judgment based on qualified immunity.1 Both Defendants are members of the Gunnison, Colorado Police Department (GPD), who contend that they are immune from liability for their alleged wrongful acts in obtaining an order for nontestimonial identification and an arrest warrant for Plaintiff. “We review the denial of immunity de novo as a final decision under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.” Snell v. Tunnell, 920 F.2d 673, 675 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Frasier v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  2. Gehl Group v. KobyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Poolaw v. MarcantelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Beard v. City of NorthglennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Gallegos v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API