Legal Opinion

Fagot Rodriguez v. Republic of Costa Rica

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided March 31, 2000No. Civil 93-2406 DRDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DOMINGUEZ, District Judge.

By Opinion and Order dated December 29,1999 (Docket No. 199), the Court determined that the Republic of Costa Rica and the Consulate of Costa Rica (hereinafter collective!y referred to as “Costa Rica”) could potentially be held liable in tort for having trespassed the Fagot’s property when they established a consular office therein without the Fagot’s prior consent and in direct and open contradiction to the lease agreement signed by the Fourniers. Hatahley v. U.S., 351 U.S. 173, 76 S.Ct. 745, 100 L.Ed. 1065 (1956) (actions for trespass are not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Fernández Mariño v. San Juan Cement Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
Denise COUTIN, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. YOUNG & RUBICAM PUERTO RICO, INC., Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
Ronald Borden v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Ronald Borden v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
Tokyo Marine & Fire Insurance v. Perez & Cia.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Fagot Rodriguez v. Republic of Costa RicaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002