Legal Opinion

Tatham v. Wabash Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 13, 1951No. Gen. No. 45,147PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s second amended complaint, plaintiff elected to stand by the pleading, and the trial court entered an order sustaining the motion to strike and entered judgment for defendant with costs. Plaintiff appeals.

The second amended complaint alleges that on December 7, 1945, defendant railroad was engaged in interstate commerce, that plaintiff was employed by it in interstate commerce in the capacity “of gang foreman in the defendant’s shop,” and that both plaintiff and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lillie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Davis v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SouthwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Roebuck v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tatham v. Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API