McDowell v. Standard Oil Co.

ON REHEARING

On application for rehearing appellant suggests that this court failed to give sufficient consideration to his arguments in support of propositions of law II and V.

Appellant’s proposition of law V is as follows:

"The practical effect of the much discussed parol evidence rule is that, when the court sees that a separate collateral agreement was probably intended by the parties, evidence of it is admitted.”

The case of Cryar v. Ogle, 19 Ala.App. 493, 99 So. 157 is cited in support of this proposition. In Cryar there were two separate and distinct agreements — one written, the other…