Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Proudfoot Consulting Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 2009No. 4D09-20PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner F. Steven Hitchcock seeks certiorari review of an order adopting a special magistrate’s denial of petitioner’s renewed motion for protective order and granting a motion to compel deposition answers, overruling petitioner’s claim of Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

We grant this petition and quash the order in this case because the record be fore us demonstrates that petitioner was presented at deposition with questions which might provide a foundation for a possible criminal prosecution for the unauthorized practice of law. DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Co., 436 So.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pillsbury Co. v. ConboySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Magid v. WinterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herman v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API