Legal Opinion

Sun Publishing Co. v. Minnesota Type Foundry Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Coos county: M. L. Pipes, Judge.. Defendant appeals. The questions of law argued upon this appeal arise upon the findings of the court below, which findings are .as follows: “The above-named action came on to be heard at the regular term of said court, the plaintiffs appearing by their attorneys, J. M. Siglin and S. H. Hazard, and the •defendant by its attorney, John Gray; and the parties consenting and agreeing, a trial by jury was waived, and the trial was had before the…

Read the full summary

Coos county: M. L. Pipes, Judge.. Defendant appeals. The questions of law argued upon this appeal arise upon the findings of the court below, which findings are .as follows: “The above-named action came on to be heard at the regular term of said court, the plaintiffs appearing by their attorneys, J. M. Siglin and S. H. Hazard, and the •defendant by its attorney, John Gray; and the parties consenting and agreeing, a trial by jury was waived, and the trial was had before the court alone; and after hearing the evidence and the argument of counsel, the court being in doubt what decision ought to…

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, C. J.

The most that can be claimed for the writing signed by F. E. Hall on the seventh of October, 1890, is that it is an offer on the part of the defendant to sell to A. W. Sefton and J. M. Siglin a printing outfit, comprising a listed invoice, at certain rates of discount; and the letter addressed to the defendant by Siglin & Luse under date of November 7,1890, enclosing list of machinery and material wanted, was a notice to the defendant that Messrs. Siglin & Luse were willing to buy the outfit under the terms previously proposed to Sefton & Siglin, and a request that the same be billed and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Orr v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Croninger v. . CrockerNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Higgins v. . Delaware, L. W.R.R.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Bruce v. PearsonNew York Supreme Court · 1808

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. SllvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bamberger Bros. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Lenz v. BlakeOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Steiger v. FronhoferOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Prescott & Co. v. J. B. Powles & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API