Legal Opinion

Rohlfs v. KLEMENHAGEN, LLC

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2009No. DA 08-0399Published

1Dissent · CotterJustice Cotter

¶44 Though I do not join Justice Nelson’s Dissent verbatim, I strongly agree with his well-reasoned conclusion that § 27-1-710(6), MCA, is special legislation prohibited by Article V, Section 12 of the Montana Constitution. In this connection, I fully concur with his observations set forth in ¶¶ 101-111. Legislative insulation of those who provide alcohol to intoxicated persons from the operation of law applicable to all other tortfeasors is an indefensible particular privilege prohibited by our Constitution. The notice provision also constitutes an indefensible disability imposed upon those…

Also in this document: Dissent · Nelson.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Elder v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Yeoman v. Com., Health Policy Bd.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API