Legal Opinion

Surls v. Saginaw Quarries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 18, 2000No. 83,095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Saginaw Quarries, Inc., and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, (collectively Saginaw) appeal the allocation of a workers compensation award in favor of George Surls. The Workers Compensation Board (Board) found Saginaw was responsible to Surls for 8.75% functional impairment and 83.5% permanent partial general disability. The Board found Neosho Construction and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (collectively Neosho) were responsible to Surls for an award of an additional 3% functional impairment. Saginaw (Surls’ employer during the first injury) argues that Neosho (Surls’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  3. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Gleason v. Samaritan Home & Church Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Copeland v. Johnson Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tull v. ATCHISON LEATHER PRODUCTS, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  2. Jordan v. Pyle, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. Smith v. ROSSVILLE VALLEY MANOR/CORPORATECourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API