Legal Opinion

Dorn v. Bradner Smith & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, upon a promissory note. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Francis Adams, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

The record in this case discloses a peculiar state of affairs.

Defendant in error, a corporation, brought suit in assumpsit to recover upon a promissory, note of which plaintiff in error Gay-Dorn was the maker, and which the other plaintiff' in error, DeWitt Taylor Kennard, had indorsed. It is not necessary to recite all the proceedings, but April 20, 1896, a second amended declaration was filed, and May 8th thereafter defendants, on motion of their attorney, were given ten days additional time in which to plead. Upon the 20th of May a general demurrer appears to have been filed in the names…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Deneen v. PicklerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Pfirmann v. HenkelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
  3. Faurot v. Park National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. Wells v. MathewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  5. Schuh v. D'OenchIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dorn v. BriggsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API