Legal Opinion

H. & J. Mabury Co. v. Bryant

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1937No. L. A. 16173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Judgment was entered for the plaintiff in this action to quiet title. The defendants noticed an appeal therefrom and from an order denying a motion to vacate the judgment made under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has moved to dismiss both appeals.

The motion must be denied in so far as it is directed to the appeal from the judgment. That appeal was timely noticed and there has been filed herein a duly certified clerk’s transcript of the judgment roll. The fact that other improperly included matters appear therein does not destroy it as a clerk’s transcript of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Sutcliffe v. SutcliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clanton v. ClantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. H. & J. Mabury Co. v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Santa Ana Mortgage & Investment Co. v. Ernest Rurup EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Broderick v. Majestic Ice Cream Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API