Legal Opinion

United States v. Schnupp

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 18, 2004No. 03-1964, 03-3384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Chief Judge.

At issue is whether a criminal sentence served in an alternative housing facility such as a halfway house can qualify as “a prior sentence of imprisonment” under § 4A1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines for the purpose of calculating the criminal history score. In two separate cases before us, United States v. Schnupp, No. 03-1964, and United States v. Wormsley, No. 03-3384, defendants contend their prior sentences served in halfway houses should be classified under § 4A1.1 as “prior sentences,” not “prior sentences of imprisonment.” Defendants seek…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. Kathleen Kremser JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Adrian Pielago, Maria VaronaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Bruce Loren LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Steven B. ZatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. United States v. Andrea Schnupp, A/K/A Andrea Lyle Andrea Schnupp, United States of America v. Eric Lamar Wormsley, A/K/A Michael Wormsley, A/K/A Michael Wallace Eric Lamar WormsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API