United States v. Schnupp
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
At issue is whether a criminal sentence served in an alternative housing facility such as a halfway house can qualify as “a prior sentence of imprisonment” under § 4A1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines for the purpose of calculating the criminal history score. In two separate cases before us, United States v. Schnupp, No. 03-1964, and United States v. Wormsley, No. 03-3384, defendants contend their prior sentences served in halfway houses should be classified under § 4A1.1 as “prior sentences,” not “prior sentences of imprisonment.” Defendants seek…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Buford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Kathleen Kremser JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Adrian Pielago, Maria VaronaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Bruce Loren LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Steven B. ZatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- United States v. Andrea Schnupp, A/K/A Andrea Lyle Andrea Schnupp, United States of America v. Eric Lamar Wormsley, A/K/A Michael Wormsley, A/K/A Michael Wallace Eric Lamar WormsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004