Legal Opinion
Tedeschi v. Barney
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 18, 1982No. 81 Civ. 6938PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*183MEMORANDUM OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Following the service of an amended complaint, the defendants moved (1) to dismiss five of its six causes of action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and (2) for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 as to the remaining cause of action. However, before these motions were heard, the plaintiffs, although they had commenced the action in this forum, moved to transfer it pursuant to 28 U.S.C., section 1404(a) to the District of New Jersey. The Court denied the motion to transfer as well as a subsequent motion for reargument. Thereafter, and before…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edward O. Thorp v. John Scarne and Simon & Schuster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Exxon Corporation v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Joseph R. Armstrong, Sr. v. The Frostie Company, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tedeschi v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Ansonia Tenants' Coalition, Inc. v. Ansonia AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Finley Lines Joint Protective Board Unit 200, Brotherhood Railway Carmen, a Division of Transportation Communications Union v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Boynes v. Limetree Bay Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2025
- Finley Lines Joint Protective Board Unit 200 v. Norfolk Southern CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.