Legal Opinion
Rovegno v. Lush
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFred J. Munder, J.
The plaintiffs, long after filing their note of issue and statement of readiness, have served upon the defendants, Lush, a notice to admit the truth of the following facts: . j - J i,i¡
“ 1. That on the 13th day of May, 1962, at or about 5:50 a.m., the defendant, harry lush was operating his vehicle in an easterly direction on Jericho Turnpike, Huntington Station, New York.
“ 2. That at the aforesaid time and place, the motor vehicle the said harry lush was operating, was in collision with a 1956 Chevrolet operated by the defendant, jule Audrey carretta, at the intersection of New York Avenue…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lambert v. LambertNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Jackson, New York County Courts1973
- Connell v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979
- Demex Corp. v. Gendelman Rigging & Trucking Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1977
- Dunbar v. G. & S. PartnersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990