Legal Opinion

Tracy v. Wikoff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1785PublishedCited by 5 opinions

IN this cause the Chief Justice laid down the following rule in computing interest.

1Opinion of the Court

M'Kean, Chief Justice.

The rule of computing interest must be such, that the interest money paid in time, must be deducted from the interest of the whole sum due at the time appointed by the instrument for making the payment. For instance, a bond to pay £. 100, with annual interest at 6 per cent and at the end of six months, £.50 is paid in. This payment shall not be apportioned, £.3 to the discharge of the half year’s interest, and £.47 to the dimunition of the principal; so as to calculate the remaining interest at 6 per cent. upon £.53 for six months; But the interest shall be charged at…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dean v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  2. State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1817
  3. Marshall v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1945
  4. Morris v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1823
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1817

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API