Fiske v. Soule
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Plaintiffs are real estate and insurance agents. They claim that the defendant employed them to sell for him certain real estate on certain terms and conditions, which they fulfilled, but that" notwithstanding defendant’s agreement to pay their commissions for making the sale which he authorized, he has refused to pay them; and to recover what is due them, they have brought this suit. They recovered a judgment for the sum of $2,103.50, with interest thereon from the fifth day of May, 1887, and costs, from which, and an order refusing a new trial, this appeal is taken by the defendant.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dolan v. ScanlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Fenn v. Ware & OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.