Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1989No. 88-1121, 88-1122PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

538 So.2d 468 (1989)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,

v.

Thomas HALL and James F. Peterson, Appellees.

Nos. 88-1121, 88-1122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 5, 1989.

Rehearing Denied February 21, 1989.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

2Per curiam

The state appeals from sentences imposed on Hall and Peterson. They were both convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine,[1] which requires the imposition…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SamudioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. MacK v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Rosa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. State v. McKenzieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. McNair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Mims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Bernadini v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API