Legal Opinion

Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 15, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00172Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS M. SALAS RAZO, on his own Case No. 1:20-cv-00172-NONE-HBK behalf and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 13 Plaintiffs, APPOINT INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL1 14 v. (Doc. No. 24) 15 AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, SEVEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 Defendant. 17 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Pending is Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Interim Class Counsel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 23(g). (Doc. No. 24, “Motion”). Plaintiff seeks the appointment of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Erick Arevalo v. Vicki HennessyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API