Legal Opinion
Gurnitz v. Lasits-Rohline Service, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 6, 2006No. 3—06—0216PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDADE
Claimant, John Gurnitz, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Will County denying his motion for leave to file an amended complaint relating to a decision of the Industrial Commission of Illinois (Commission). Respondent employer is Lasits-Rohline Service, Inc. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Claimant sought a workers’ compensation award for injuries sustained while employed by respondent. On December 1, 2000, an arbitrator found claimant to be partially disabled as a result of an accident during the course of his employment. The corresponding monetary award for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Loyola Academy v. S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Ahlers v. Sears, Roebuck Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Franklin v. Wellco CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dallas v. Ameren CIPSAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Dallas v. CipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010