Legal Opinion
Pecile v. Titan Capital Group, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In this sexual harassment action, plaintiffs allege, inter alia, being tricked into viewing naked pictures by defendant Russell Abrams. Thus, the motion court properly directed the exchange of the CD containing those alleged photographs, since they are material and necessary to the prosecution of this action (CPLR 3101; see also Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 NY2d 403, 406 [1968]; Anonymous v High School for Envtl. Studies, 32 AD3d 353 [1st Dept 2006]). Given the personal nature of the photographs, we direct that the CD not be disseminated to anyone unconnected to the litigation.
However…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Green v. MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Anonymous v. High School for Environmental StudiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Manley v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Sansevere v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hargrove v. Riverbay Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015