State v. Shackle
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from, Cherokee District Court. Information charging that P. F. Shackle and one Rodney Willis did unlawfully sell intoxicating liquors in violation of the provisions of chapter 128 of the Laws of 1881. The sixth count of the information is as follows: “The said county attorney further informs the court and avers, that P. F. Shackle and Rodney Willis, then and there, in a certain wooden building situated and -being on lot No. 14, in block No. 16, of the original plat of…
Read the full summary
Appeal from, Cherokee District Court. Information charging that P. F. Shackle and one Rodney Willis did unlawfully sell intoxicating liquors in violation of the provisions of chapter 128 of the Laws of 1881. The sixth count of the information is as follows: “The said county attorney further informs the court and avers, that P. F. Shackle and Rodney Willis, then and there, in a certain wooden building situated and -being on lot No. 14, in block No. 16, of the original plat of the city of Columbus, in the county of Cherokee, in the state of Kansas, on the 15th day of August, 1881, did…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The defendant was charged with selling intoxicating liquors, prohibited by the provisions of chap. 128, Laws of 1881, for other than medical, scientific and mechanical purposes. A motion was made to quash the information upon various grounds, among others, that no offense was charged therein. This motion was overruled, and duly excepted to. Upon calling the ease for trial, a jury was waived, and a hearing had upon the following: “Defendant admits that on the 15th day of August, 1881, he> sold spirituous liquors, to wit, whisky, for other…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TeissedreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- MATTER OF BARSKY v. Bd. of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- MATTER OF BARSKY v. Bd. of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1953