Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 23, 1990No. 75, September Term, 1989Published

1ConcurrenceMcAULIFFE, Judge

I concur in the Court’s opinion. I write separately to express the view that the same result is reached through the application of a different, and appropriate, analysis.

The discontinuance of the original Maryland prosecution by the entry of a nolle prosequi was grounded on legitimate State interests, and represented a reasonable exercise of prosecutorial discretion. That action was not taken to harass the defendant, or to avoid a speedy trial problem, or otherwise taken in bad faith. Accordingly, the time that the defendant was not facing criminal charges in this State should not be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API