Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Mayer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; W. T. Simmons, Judge. Action by Max K. Mayer, Edward O’Brien intervening. Judgment for plaintiff. Inter-vener appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

0. W. Connery sold to M. A. Gibler a tract of land, taking in part consideration therefor the promissory note of the vendee for the sum of $6,136.75 pay-ble to Max K. Mayer, trustee, secured by a vendor’s lien on the property sold, and also a deed of trust on the same property in which John W. Wray was named as trustee. In a suit by the payee upon the note, Edward O’Brien intervened, claiming an interest in the property; and from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff: for the amount due upon the note with foreclosure of the liens retained in the note and deed of trust the intervener has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. PardeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Rhodes v. MaretCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas Overall Co. v. MummertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Finks v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Funk v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API