United States v. Borodzik
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*96Opinion of the Court
DARDEN, Chief Judge:
The appellant appeals his conviction for larceny of 11 Government-owned aviation stopwatches. He contends that eight of the watches were improperly introduced into evidence because the Government obtained them in violation of his Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 831, rights and of his right to counsel.
At the time of this incident the appellant was a Storekeeper Second Class serving at the Naval Air Station in Brunswick, Maine. His wife and children lived in a civilian apartment in Quincy, Massachusetts. On Friday afternoon, May 9,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. NowlingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. DohleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. ByersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. MuldoonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.