In re Panara

OPINION OF THE COURT

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 18, 1976, and maintains an office for the practice of law in Hamburg. Petitioner filed a petition charging respon*79dent with five counts of professional misconduct. The petition alleged that respondent commingled client funds with personal funds; converted client funds; intentionally charged clients amounts in excess of actual expenses and for fictitious expenses; represented parties with conflicting interests without obtaining the consent of the clients after full disclosure; and intentionally altered…